My reflections on a number of topics following my trip to Israel with Birthright in December in 2011 and posts about my 5 month long experience in 2013.
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Big Question
Politics
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Where Are We?
The borders of Israel in ancient times were defined roughly by… well this is where it starts to get complicated. There is the area described in the Torah, the areas controlled before King David, the areas controlled by David and Solomon and the area controlled but defined by foreign rulers such as the Romans. Like all maps in ancient times the lines were fluid, and described in rough geographic terms, often using names and markers that have disappeared since.

The creation of the lines of the Modern State of Israel are just as fluid. With the creation of modern Zionism, an effort was made to define the lines of what would be Israel. This story is worth a book, but the truncated version is that from roughly 1909 with the founding of Tel Aviv and the formation of the first Kibbutz a year later, Jews attempted to create a foothold everywhere they could by buying land from Arabs and living there. By the 30s and 40s this sometimes meant terrorism (on both sides) and even pitched battles to protect homes and farms.
From 1945 to 1947 there were almost constant skirmishes between Arabs and Jews, only sometimes mediated by the British. Following the vote in 1947 by the UN to establish Israel there was a rush to expand/define the borders as much as possible. The end of fighting in 1948 seemed to establish a set border for Israel. That all changed in 1967.
Almost everywhere we went was defined or changed in some significant way by the 1967 war. What happens to the land Israel won in that war is at the core of the peace process. All the land won and given away (returned?) in wars and peace agreements almost seem trivial to these lines (of course nothing is trivial on this topic).
Below a map from PBS with its own views, biases and issues.
Before I went to Israel I had the fairly standard liberal view, which is to say “Establish two economically viable states and things will calm down”. What this trip reinforced for me is how difficult that really is. The lines as draw in 1947 and 1948 were established by the British with crude maps, ignorant of where people lived and then redrawn by where the front lines were prior to the ceasefire. Since 1967 some areas have seen significant changes.
Do you return to the original lines ignoring the Arab villages split for no reason by the “Green Line”? Do you force Israelis to abandon not crude settlements but actual suburban neighborhoods and go back to old lines? What do you do with Jerusalem?
Understanding the “hard line” Israeli answer (of course there is no such thing as one Israeli answer to anything, but ignoring that) was much easier after this trip. When you can stand in one place and see a thriving farm literally in the shadow of what used to be two foreign powers it is a little easier to understand not wanting to give up an inch of territory.
If my notes are right the above should be looking into Lebanon
The most striking area for some reason was the day we met with an Israeli Arab (more on this later) and stood on an overlook which sits on the “Green Line” (the Green Line is the 1948 border). From that outlook you could see straight into the port city of Hadera and see the Mediterranean. It is easy to understand what some call “paranoia” might not be so crazy after all when you see a distance that I could walk in a day is all that stands between an army splitting the country in two.
Standing on the Green Line on a very windy day. The Arab village behind and below me was split in 1948 because it sits on both sides of a river and the British maps weren't precise.
Picture taken looking into Syria from a former Israeli military post on the Golan Heights. Some maps have this spot as Israel, some as Syria, some as "UN monitored". With the proper equipment the Israeli military can see what movies are playing in Damascus from here.
In Israel everyone has an opinion on what those lines mean and what they should look like. There are those who think the borders should look like they did at the time of the bible, those who want safety through cooperation with their Arab neighbors, those who want safety though strength and military protection, and many other points of view.
In many ways this trip made me less certain of what Israel should (and maybe does?) look like. In a country where disputes about borders are now determined by lawsuits, it’s easy to forget that even the US has borders forged in wars. But I know what North Carolina looks like, and I can draw a picture of it without making anyone mad. You can’t say the same thing about Israel, and I am struggling to figure out what that means for the people who live there.
If I Had a Shekel…
If I had a Shekel for every time someone said the word “complicated” on this trip, I would probably be able to pay off my school loans.
The funny thing about it is that “complicated” is in itself a very real understatement when talking about modern Israel. Very few questions that we asked didn’t involve the word in one way or another, and it was always accurate.
From Masada looking back at the Dead Sea. Both have their own "complications"
In Israel just the very simple task of saying where you are is fraught with numerous political pitfalls. By using one word to say “we visited ___” instead of a different name I am making a political judgment, conscious or not. For someone like me who tries very hard to attempt to understand everyone (even when the “other side” is 100% wrong), it was both incredibly enjoyable and infinitely frustrating to know that I was making a political declaration by standing somewhere.
For this blog I will do my best to present the alternative sides as I understand them, but I will also try to avoid using “complicated” in every sentence. Any attempt to avoid controversy with place names is probably impossible, so I will call it what it was called by Jamie and let the chips fall where they may.
Brad(l) does his best impression of Israel as Jamie(r) explains the map.
Speaking of complicated, this is as good a time as any to introduce our amazing and incredibly knowledgeable tour guide Jamie. A native of London, he made Aliyah at the age of 25, about 13 years ago, as an expression of his increased awareness of what it meant for him to be Jewish. He is married to a Long Island native and has one son, and by time I write this is probably the father of another son or daughter. Jamie tried (and I believe succeeded) to present every issue as fairly and objectively as possible. He did his best to explain each side, and avoided making many large declarations.
As I said above, being objective in Israel is simply impossible, but Jamie certainly made a herculean effort to do so. Beyond the tour, I had a few opportunities to ask much more detailed and pointed questions about specific topics, where he displayed the same ability to present all sides. Having a tour guide who was able to discuss at length everything from Biblical stories to the state of domestic economic policies was invaluable to my tour. Something I will attempt to talk about later is Jamie’s own complicated relationship with some of the places we visited.
Monday, December 26, 2011
Map
Introduction
I realized a few days into my trip to Israel that it was just too big, too overwhelming to talk about in short facebook or twitter posts. So over the next few weeks I will use this try and describe, explain, expand on all the things I saw and experienced.


